ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOC , 页数:3 ,大小:37KB ,
资源ID:345423      下载积分:4 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.ketangku.com/wenku/file-345423-down.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(CNN英语听力2013年02月(WORD文本):20130209CNN.doc)为本站会员(a****)主动上传,免费在线备课命题出卷组卷网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知免费在线备课命题出卷组卷网(发送邮件至kefu@ketangku.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

CNN英语听力2013年02月(WORD文本):20130209CNN.doc

1、A man holds a child at gunpoint after shooting and killing a school bus driver which was our lead story tonight. And another man, walks into a Phoenix office building and opens fire, hitting three killing one. Those are just two headlines from today, thereve been many other recently, some far worse,

2、 of course. Keep them honest though, how big role if any does easy access to firearms play in violent crime like this. Thats a question, crucially how do we really know what the true facts are, you know, our both sides building their cases on, on shaky factual ground. Today in testimony before the s

3、enate judiciary committee, former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords who survived the Tucson massacre spoke of the need for action.Thank you for inviting me here today, this is an important conversation for our children, for our communities, for Democrats and Republicans, speaking is difficult, but I need

4、 to say something important. Violent is a big problem, too many children are dying, to many children, we must do something. It will be hard, but the time is now. You must act, be bold, be courageous, Americans are counting on you. Thank you.Well, she spoke from handwrite note which were posted on th

5、e facebook page, the gun reform group, that she and her husband, former astronaut, Mark Kelly, founded. He also testified along with the National Rifle Associations Wayne LaPierre and others, commander Kelly at one point answering Mr.LaPierres claim that background check dont need to be made univers

6、al.My wife would not be sitting in this seat, she would not have been sitting here today. If we had stronger background checks.On the NRA position, though, and its shared by many people that criminals would still be able to get and use firearms tha banning high capacity magazines would similarly not

7、 work, nor would with reinstating the ban on semiautomatic weapons. Such as the one used in Newtown, Aurora and elsewhere. Now there is just one problem, both sides on the gun debate, use the assault weapons ban, which was in effect from 1994 to 2004 to make there case. Listen.Independent studies, i

8、ncluding one from the Clinton justice department, prove that it had no impact in lowering crime.The department of justice report assault weapons as a percentage of gun, of gun traces, which shows the 70% decline.While arm security works, gun bans do not.Ive been as law enforcement for nearly 35 year

9、s, Ive seen an explosion of fire power since the assault weapons ban expired, victims are being riddled with the mutiple gunshots.To reenact a law that according to the Department of justice did absolutely nothing to reduce gun violence.The 1994 assault weapon ban did not stop columbine, the justice

10、 department found the ban ineffective.You might hear all those sides and say to yourself, all both sides can not be right. The problem is there is really no clear cut way of telling who is, not just because each side accuses the other of cherry picking the data. The real problem is that there simply

11、 not enough good research to draw solid conclusions. Take a look at where the nonpartisan congressional research services, concluded in a November report on the existing body of knowledge, and they quote, none of the existing sources of statistics provide either comprehensive, timely or accurate dat

12、a with which to assess definitively whether there is a cause of connection between firearms and violent And a big reason for that scarcity of good research, well, Congress under pressure from the gun lobby doesnt pay for it. Take a look from 1993 through 1996, Congress allocated about $2.5 million d

13、ollar annually, so the Centers for Disease Control, the CDC, could study gun violence. But since 1996, the money has dried up, averaging just $100,000 a year over the last three years and a budget of nearly $6 billion. Now, having said all that, the lack of definitive research has not stopped policy makers and community members from doing what they can with what theyve got in the struggle against gun violence and learning as they go. Few know that better than long time New York City police commissioner Ray Kelly who joins me now.

Copyright@ 2020-2024 m.ketangku.com网站版权所有

黑ICP备2024021605号-1